Turkish Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Çiğdem ULUKAYA DURAKBAŞA, Hamit OKUR, H.Murat MUTUŞ, Ahmet BAŞ, Müzeyyen SERT, A. Nadir TOSYALI, Varol ŞEHİRALTI

SB Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Çocuk Cerrahisi Kliniği, İstanbul

Keywords: PEG, gastrostomy, percutaneous endoscopic, children, complication

Abstract

Aims: The experience on pediatric percutaneous endosco- pic gastrostomy (PEG) applications is relatively limited in children in our country. An audit regarding PEG indicati- ons, complications, outcome and follow up is presented.

Material and Methods: Beginning with the first case, a retrospective review of all children who underwent a PEG application was conducted by patient files, follow up re- cords and telephone interviews for the most current data.

Results: During a 44-month period, 26 PEG applications were done in 25 children. There were 11 males and 14 fe- males. The median age was 76 months (range, 8 months-14 years). The most frequent indication for PEG insertion was chronic neurological disease (n=18) followed by intracra- nial tumors (n=6) and cleft palate (n=1). All procedures were done under general anesthesia in the operating suit. No early postoperative complications were encountered. Feeding through the catheter was initiated in the3rd posto- perative day in all. The mean postoperative follow up was 13 months (range, 1,5-44 months). No procedure related deaths occurred; 10 children died of underlying disorders on an average of 8 months after PEG insertion. Among the remaining children, the catheter was removed in 2 after a mean of 9 months as the oral feeding was re-established. In one patient, a gastrocolic fistula was detected 4 months after PEG insertion. In an elective laparotomy, a Stamm gastrostomy was performed. In another one an open fun- doplication with gastrostomy was done 5 months later. The remaining 11 children are alive and actively using the PEG catheters. Among these, one patient had a gross leakage at the gastrostomy site that cannot be managed conservati- vely. He underwent a second PEG insertion with removal of the first one.

Conclusions: PEG offers the advantages of being a mi- nimally invasive procedure, being easy to care for and enabling a permanent access for enteral nutrition in han- dicapped children. Regarding its simplicity, effectiveness and reproducibility, PEG should be the first-line method for providing long-term artificial enteral nutrition and de- finitely deserves every effort to be used more widely in our country.